In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. Cactus Communications. My experiences with these journals have not been this positive. Currently, the status is "Peer Review Over" and "Decision Started" since more than 15 days. AE stands for Associate Editor. edit the language for maximum clarity and precision for those in other disciplines. Languages English Espaol Portugus Research Creative My Account Submit My Manuscript
The SEC pay-to-play rule for investment advisers as it turns 12 At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". It's true that editorial rejections can be very rapid based on scope and perceived 'gee whiz' factor. Congratulations! reach a conclusion of interest to an interdisciplinary readership. If the reviewers wish to be named their names will appear in alphabetical order at the end of the paper in a statement as below: Any reviewers that wish to remain anonymous will be acknowledged using a slightly modified statement: If no reviewers agree to be named, we will still acknowledge their valuable service using the statement below: Nature makes decisions about submitted papers as rapidly as possible. Usually, the times vary from two to six months, but there is no fixed rule. [CDATA[// > And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook.
Ford 1997 Washington Cars for sale - SmartMotorGuide.com Cactus Communications. The Decision Started status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journals editorial board is in the process of making a decision. Production Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Nature is a British weekly scientific journal founded and based in London, England.As a multidisciplinary publication, Nature features peer-reviewed research from a variety of academic disciplines, mainly in science and technology. on 07 Apr, 2021, This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage. Editing and proofreading services for a publication-ready manuscript, Customized service packs to match all publication needs, Expert help for all academic translation needs. So in conclusion, yes, editors can add reviews but should do so with extreme caution and rarity. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I am faced with the same situation right now. [CDATA[// >How long does an editor decision take? - Studybuff Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. Press J to jump to the feed. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. Authors should note that as Nature is an interdisciplinary journal, referees for a paper are chosen for different reasons, for example a technical expert and a person who has a general overview of a field might both referee the same paper. Proofs are cycled between Natures production staff, our typesetter and the author by means of an online production-tracking system. Please share with the community how many days the entire process took by the editor's office. No, Modified on: Fri, 10 Sep, 2021 at 3:16 PM. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. In which case does PLOS ONE use a third reviewer? //-->editor decision started nature By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Most papers are sent to two or three referees, but some are sent to more or, occasionally, just to one. One's knowledge, images, and emotions regarding the past have an impact on future actions. Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. [CDATA[// >How, when, and why you should appeal an editor's decision - Cell How do I align things in the following tabular environment? All Nature editors report to the Editor of Nature, who sets Nature's publication policies. ]]> Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. It could mean just about anything. It doesnt mean anything other than the editor has started to look at your paper. 9.3 weeks. 1) After submission, the system shows that Manuscript under consideration, which means that it is being evaluated by the editor; 2) If the latest status becomes Editor decision started, it means it has been sent for review (you can also check whether there is reviewer.zip in the file list, if yes, it means it is sent .
- The content of the press release mailing and papers described therein is embargoed until 1600 London time/1100 US Eastern Time on the day of publication, which is the time at which the research is published and become publicly available. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. Although Nature editors go to every effort to ensure manuscripts are assessed fairly, Nature is not responsible for the conduct of its referees.Nature welcomes authors' suggestions for suitable independent referees (with their contact details), but editors are free to decide themselves who to use as referees.