response of Tory MP to - NEW In 1945 the Conservatives had suffered from being divided and disorganised, while Labour had been strong and united. It had several effects, all of which were harmful in both the long and short term. The newly recruited young members dramatically contrasted with the aging Labour cabinet and presented the Conservatives as a rising party fit to govern. But Labour didn't lose in 1983 because it was too left wing; rather, Thatcher won because of the Falklands War. Appeasement wasn't, at the time, a hugely contentious issue however after the war many people believed this was a large reason for the war and the Conservatives were blamed. and failed to outline their accepting the ideas of NHS and that How valid is this view in relation to the 1951 general election? There are several causes which can be established, first by looking at the events of the Attlee years and then isolating those points at which factors were working toward the party's defeat.The 1945-1946 period of Labour government sought to address some key difficulties facing the nation following World War II. Labour's campaign, although not crucial to their success, was better organised, funded and planned than the Conservatives' and, as such, made Labour look strong - in contrast with the Conservatives. The split ran deep within the Labour party and consequently it was deeply weakened, so when it came to the 1951 election, Labour found it much harder to fight against the now united Conservatives who had been re-organisation under a new leader. As he struggled to justify his November emergency budget tightening spending and committing to an exchange rate policy subservient to US demands, Dalton resigned as Chancellor. Please wait while we set up your subscription TurnItIn the anti-plagiarism experts are also used by: King's College London, Newcastle University, University of Bristol, University of Cambridge, WJEC, AQA, OCR and Edexcel, Business, Companies and Organisation, Activity, Height and Weight of Pupils and other Mayfield High School investigations, Lawrence Ferlinghetti: Two Scavengers in a Truck, Two Beautiful People in a Mercedes, Moniza Alvi: Presents from my Aunts in Pakistan, Changing Materials - The Earth and its Atmosphere, Fine Art, Design Studies, Art History, Crafts, European Languages, Literature and related subjects, Linguistics, Classics and related subjects, Structures, Objectives & External Influences, Global Interdependence & Economic Transition, Acquiring, Developing & Performance Skill, Sociological Differentiation & Stratification, The question as to why Labour won the 1945 election has been the source of much in depth study since the period. Never before had the party achieved an overall majority in the House of Commons, and yet now Labour had a huge parliamentary majority of 146 seats. Why Did Clement Attlee Lose The 1951 Election? - FAQS Clear She believed that Social changes should come Chris Harman: Why Labour fails (June 1979) - marxists.org members, Alongside this was the memory from On a high turnout Labour's tally of votes had actually increased in absolute terms (to 13.9 million, compared to 13.2 million in the 1950 cent) than the Conservatives, though the Conservatives came out ahead in seats, Labours answer focused on working class interests. Looking at the Labour government in these four sections of reform, of crisis, of consolidation and of division helps us to see where the party lost its huge majority. Named Let Us Face the Future, it emphasised that Labour were the only party that could be trusted to deliver a strong Britain and Beveridge's plans. why did labour lose the 1951 election - mipandillafavorita.cl It called for a reelection the next year. Winston Churchill Won World War II. So Why Did He Lose the 1945 While the more right-wing Gaitsgillites wanted more concentration on an aggressive foreign policy on issues like the cold war. As a response to the housing problem, Dalton committed to building one million new homes, 80% of which were council houses to be rented cheaply to those who most needed them. 1. 1.5 billion from Canada The consequences of entering the Korean War in June 1950 also contributed to Labours downfall. (45 Marks) The 3rd May 1979 saw the greatest parliamentary swing since the war, with the Conservative Party polling 43.9% of the vote; thereby winning 339 seats (up 62 since the last election). 'Labour Lost the 1979 Uk General Election Due to the Strength of the Conservative Opposition'. Finally, splits over the Korean War both over the political justifications for British deployment, and over the cuts in public spending domestically brought about splits in the party which made it poorly placed to fight the 1951 election. Britain to become a world exporting power, In the 1950 election, the Liberals put up 475 candidates and secured 2.6 million votes (9.1% of the entire vote). million if some charged could be made on By 1947, more than one fifth of British industry had been drawn into public ownership. By 1951, however, their roles had reversed. We have detected that Javascript is not enabled in your browser. my could least handle it, and Labour was blamed by a weary public in 1951. Activision's Spycraft: The Great Game is the product of a very specific era of computer gaming, when "multimedia" and "interactive movies" were among the buzzwords of the zeitgeist. This committed the UK government to keeping the value of sterling at a stable rate against the US dollar, and this meant that the governments hands were tied as they sought to address Britains balance of payments deficit by means of international trade. Labour actually gained fewer votes than in 1959, but the Conservatives lost 1.6 million votes and the Liberals gained over 1.5 million votes. He beat the Zeitgeist, the vibe and the emotional appeals while leaving Clive Palmer and the Greens failing to live up to expectations. Working class voters, on the other hand, remained loyal to the Labour Party and the 1951 election saw Labour poll the highest aggregate popular vote ever achieved in Britain. With an inadequate sense of self-renewal, the Attlee era party had little further to put before voters after 1947. In contrast to the break-up of the MacDonald Labour government in 1931, there was no 'bankers' ramp' or dramatic and overwhelming financial crisis. Divisions over appeasement, foreign policy and rearmament deeply weakened Labour. Maybe not the most important factor, but definitely worth noting, is the fact that the UK employs a first-past-the-post electoral system. The Attlee governments of 1945 to 1951 can be divided into four key sections. Labours changes, The Spectator wrote: The conservatives of Why didn't Labour win the election 1948 Representation of the People Act What was the name of the 1948 law which changed constituency boundaries Liberal Party What party saw their vote fall from 2.6 million to 730,556 Sets with similar terms POLS 315 Exam 3 67 terms Leiigit_Kae American Gov Unit 4 Exam 91 terms Alexis_Martyn45 Just by losing a core of middle class voters, Labour lost a great many marginal contests and most particularly in the well-to-do constituencies of southern and south-eastern England. The Blitz also, more obviously, caused a huge rise in support for Labour's housing development plans. The economy's recovery was further hindered by the short-sighted need to remain a world power. Two cabinet ministers resigned in protest &ndash . The caretaker government, led by Churchill, was heavily defeated. BBC Politics 97 - Logo of the BBC The Labour Party was born at the turn of the 20th . Both clearly agree that the pre-war period was significant, however they differ on why it was significant. Furthermore, an apparently humiliating trade policy including subservience to US demands was particularly discrediting in the eyes of post-colonialists who identified this as betrayal rather than pragmatism. Whilst in 1951 the Labour government was punished for its unrealistic promises made in 1945. Labour to the Conservatives - was enough to tip Labour out of office in the general election held in October 1951. Labour's promises of social reforms won them many votes, however it was these promises which led to their failure in 1951, when many people believed that the promises hadn't been delivered. Finally, splits over the Korean War both over the political justifications for British deployment, and over the cuts in public spending domestically brought about splits in the party which made it poorly placed to fight the 1951 election. I feel as though Ive spent days aimlessly searching the internet for a clear answer to this question. fundamentals called for further Dunkirk triggered many people to blame the conservatives and their previous leaders for appeasement. socialist the party The Iron and coal industries were not profitable These reforms had a deep effect on Britain, however the electorate evidently felt not enough was done to fulfil the promises of a near utopian post-war Britain. In 1951 more people voted Labour than Conservative, yet the commons meant that there was an In 1945 the Conservatives had suffered from being divided and disorganised, while Labour had been strong and united. Granted, in 45 Labour obviously won a landslide of the seats, but a majority of 8% is far from a landslide of the votes. Best Answer Copy Labour lost to various reasons, the main ones being: The Winter of Discontent, the miscalculations that James Callaghan made and the appeal of Thatcher to voters. Hugh Dalton's administration of the Gaitskell had imposed upon the health service prescription charges for glasses and false teeth, which to Bevan and other NHS idealists represented the betrayal of NHS founding principals. In this respect, although Labout lost the 1951 election, it can be claimed that they only marginally lost popular support meaning, in my opinion, the most significant factor contributing to their loss was the mistiming of the election. 'Iron Curtain' and the